{"id":924,"date":"2018-01-17T10:17:16","date_gmt":"2018-01-17T15:17:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/?p=924"},"modified":"2018-01-17T10:17:16","modified_gmt":"2018-01-17T15:17:16","slug":"beloved-beastie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/2018\/01\/17\/beloved-beastie\/","title":{"rendered":"Beloved beastie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For those of you who are SCBWI (Society of Children\u2019s Book Writers and Illustrators) members, I\u2019m teaching a workshop on Saturday afternoon, February 3rd, on writing fantasy at the national conference in New York City. I\u2019ll talk a bit and give prompts, most of which will probably come from this blog. Participants will write, and then we\u2019ll discuss. The workshop will last 2 \u00bd hours, so there will be lots of time to get into the weeds. I\u2019d love to see you there!<\/p>\n<p>Onto the post! On October 18, 2017, Melissa Mead wrote, <em>I have a \u201cbeastly\u201d question:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>What are some ways to balance out making your character beastly, yet sympathetic? In particular:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The character does something literally inhuman: that leaves the other characters (and the reader) aghast, but they don\u2019t understand why everyone\u2019s upset, because it\u2019s perfectly normal behavior where they come from.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u2026 how do you get across the shock of what they\u2019ve done, yet not lose reader sympathy?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A short back-and-forth followed.<\/p>\n<p>Aster: <em>Have you read the YA novel Six of Crows by Leigh Bardugo? One of the main characters- Kaz Brekker- does some pretty horrific things yet (and this part depends on interpretations) still is a fairly likable character.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Chrisite V Powell: <em>What about showing the inhuman culture so that the reader believes that he thinks this is normal? If it\u2019s his POV, maybe a mini flashback about someone else who did it (maybe worse?). His reaction will also say a lot, when he\u2019s confronted.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Melissa Mead: <em>That\u2019s pretty much what I\u2019ve tried to do, but I\u2019m not sure it\u2019s enough- or if the inhuman culture itself will turn readers off.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve never issued a trigger warning for a post before, but if you\u2019re prone to being nauseated, you may want to skip this one\u2013not because of anything Melissa Mead wrote but because of where I take it.<\/p>\n<p>Most days, Reggie and his pal Demi have a play date in our backyard. Demi\u2019s owner and I walk around and chat while the dogs play or ignore each other or bark at passersby. Demi often takes a poop, which Reggie sometimes eats. Ew! And double yuck! This is exceedingly inhuman behavior!<\/p>\n<p>I may not be willing to smell Reggie\u2019s breath for a year, but he\u2019s still adorable, with that big nose, pleading eyes, tell-tale tail. My love for him is undiminished despite this disgusting propensity that, like Melissa Mead&#8217;s character, he sees nothing wrong with.<\/p>\n<p>So that\u2019s one strategy: Make your monster (demon?) appealing to your POV character. If your reader likes the narrator, he probably won\u2019t be irreversibly turned off by the monster\u2019s behavior.<\/p>\n<p>Sympathy can be agonized sympathy. I think of the TV series <em>House<\/em> (high school and up). House, a brilliant doctor, is self-destructive and insensitive. Sometimes he acts cruelly, but he\u2019s also saving lives, not because he loves humanity but because he hates to fail and loves puzzles. He has a single friend and could be the source of the saying, \u201cWith friends like that, who needs enemies?\u201d I used to watch and squirm and want the best for House and keep watching.\u00a0A big part of my sympathy for House is that he does save lives. So that\u2019s another strategy: Give the reader a reason to care about the monster. Rescuing others is a time-honored reason.<\/p>\n<p>Among the worst practices I can think of is cannibalism, and yet the late sci fi writer Robert Heinlein made a good intellectual case for it in his classic, <em>Stranger in a Strange Land<\/em> (high school and up). (This is cannibalism following death from an unrelated cause\u2013people aren\u2019t killed so they can be eaten. And the book was written decades before mad cow disease was discovered.) Another strategy: Make a thoughtful argument for the offending behavior. Readers will be fascinated.<\/p>\n<p>I suspect it will also help if the demon makes clear his perspective on his act. For instance, he can invite other characters to do the same or participate. He can ask, If you don\u2019t do this (the beastly thing), how do you do that (which shows how the behavior functions in his society)? And, likewise, he might react with horror at some human customs. For example, he might be aghast that humans eat together, because in his culture eating is intensely private. There\u2019s another strategy: Make the reader understand the demon\u2019s viewpoint.<\/p>\n<p>One more: Reveal the monster\u2019s feelings, which, presumably, the reader will recognize and identify with. If, when he becomes aware of his companions\u2019 shock, he responds with confusion, dismay, even resentment, the reader is likely to relate. Even if he isn\u2019t the POV character, we can reveal his emotions through body language, dialogue, the understanding reached by our POV character, a chapter in a tome about demons and demon society, and probably more. For example, I understood Reggie&#8217;s disgusting behavior better when I read in a newspaper that dogs don&#8217;t have the region in their brains that we have to register disgust.<\/p>\n<p>Readers can have a range of responses to the demon\u2019s act. They may be intrigued or pleased by the surprise\u2013they didn\u2019t see that coming!\u2013or delighted by the author\u2019s daring. They may recognize that the behavior is beyond the pale, but it fits and, if we\u2019re really cooking, couldn\u2019t be otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>Worst case scenario, a few readers close the book. We can\u2019t please everyone. On the other hand, some will enjoy the demon\u2019s behavior but will stop reading a book if they think the writing is too cautious. That goes for gatekeepers, too. Editors and agents vary. Some may be put off, but others will be thrilled to find a writer who colors outside the lines.<\/p>\n<p>Here are four prompts:<\/p>\n<p>\u2219 Your MC is picnicking with friends. The cold baked chicken, cole slaw, potato salad are scrumptious, and the ants, who invade, think so, too. Your MC or another character\u2013you decide\u2013picks up an ant and eats it and asks people to send more her way. Write the scene. Make the reader at least understand and tolerate the ant-eating.<\/p>\n<p>\u2219 Write the above picnic scene from the POV of one of the ants, or, using the first-person plural POV discussed in a recent post, from the POV of the colony. While anthropomorphizing as little as possible, get the reader to be on the side of the ants.<\/p>\n<p>\u2219 One of your characters fights the kind of fires that destroys thousands of acres. There\u2019s no counting the people, wildlife, property, and land he\u2019s saved. However, in his personal life he\u2019s a relationship arsonist who blows up all his human connections. Write his reunion with his sister, from whom he\u2019s been estranged for many years. Make this meet-up go disastrously because of his self-sabotage. In the writing, make the reader suffer out of sympathy for him and the sister.<\/p>\n<p>\u2219 This \u201cSnow White\u201d takes place in an authoritarian society. When the hunter is given the order to kill Snow White, he has no moral compunctions, because it\u2019s right and a duty to obey the queen. Write the scene in the forest when Snow White presents an alternate ethic of compassion and individual liberty. You decide if she succeeds.<\/p>\n<p>Have fun, and save what you write!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For those of you who are SCBWI (Society of Children\u2019s Book Writers and Illustrators) members, I\u2019m teaching a workshop on Saturday afternoon, February 3rd, on writing fantasy at the national conference in New York City. I\u2019ll talk a bit and give prompts, most of which will probably come from this blog. Participants will write, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[135],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=924"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":925,"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions\/925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gailcarsonlevine.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}